4.4 Article

Microbiologically Induced Calcite Precipitation Mediated by Sporosarcina pasteurii

期刊

出版社

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/53253

关键词

Bioengineering; Issue 110; Microbiologically Induced Calcite Precipitation; Sporosarcina pasteurii; Porous medium; Culture protocol; carbon storage

资金

  1. Helmholtz-Alberta Initiative
  2. Helmholtz Association
  3. University of Alberta
  4. Helmholtz Association's Initiative and Networking Fund
  5. Government of Alberta through Alberta Environment's ecoTrust program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The particular bacterium under investigation here (S. pasteurii) is unique in its ability, under the right conditions, to induce the hydrolysis of urea (ureolysis) in naturally occurring environments through secretion of an enzyme urease. This process of ureolysis, through a chain of chemical reactions, leads to the formation of calcium carbonate precipitates. This is known as Microbiologically Induced Calcite Precipitation (MICP). The proper culture protocols for MICP are detailed here. Finally, visualization experiments under different modes of microscopy were performed to understand various aspects of the precipitation process. Techniques like optical microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-Ray Photo-electron Spectroscopy (XPS) were employed to chemically characterize the end-product. Further, the ability of these precipitates to clog pores inside a natural porous medium was demonstrated through a qualitative experiment where sponge bars were used to mimic a pore-network with a range of length scales. A sponge bar dipped in the culture medium containing the bacterial cells hardens due to the clogging of its pores resulting from the continuous process of chemical precipitation. This hardened sponge bar exhibits superior strength when compared to a control sponge bar which becomes compressed and squeezed under the action of an applied external load, while the hardened bar is able to support the same weight with little deformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据