4.5 Article

Continuous theta burst stimulation over the bilateral supplementary motor area in obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment: A clinical randomized single-blind sham-controlled trial

期刊

EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2323

关键词

Bilateral supplementary motor area; continuous theta burst stimulation; obsessive-compulsive disorder; treatment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771460, 81671340]
  2. Shanghai Jiao Tong University star of Jiao Tong University medical engineering cross research fund key project [YG2021ZD28]
  3. Shanghai Hospital Development Center [SHDC12018115]
  4. Key Program of Shanghai Mental Health Center
  5. Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders [13dz2260500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over the bilateral supplementary motor area (SMA) is a safe and tolerable treatment for OCD patients, which significantly improves depression and anxiety levels but has limited effect on OCD symptoms.
Background Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can cause substantial damage to quality of life. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) is a promising treatment for OCD patients with the advantages of safety and noninvasiveness. Objective The present study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy of cTBS over the bilateral supplementary motor area (SMA) for OCD patients with a single-blind, sham-controlled design. Methods Fifty-four OCD patients were randomized to receive active or sham cTBS treatment over the bilateral SMA for 4 weeks (five sessions per week, 20 sessions in total). Patients were assessed at baseline (week 0), the end of treatment (week 4), and follow-up (week 8). Clinical scales included the YBOCS, HAMD(24), HAMA(14), and OBQ(44). Three behavioral tests were also conducted to explore the effect of cTBS on response inhibition and decision-making in OCD patients. Results The treatment response rates were not significantly different between the two groups at week 4 (active: 23.1% vs. sham: 16.7%, p = 0.571) and week 8 (active: 26.9% vs. sham: 16.7%, p = 0.382). Depression and anxiety improvements were significantly different between the two groups at week 4 (HAMD(24): F = 4.644, p = 0.037; HAMA(14): F = 5.219, p = 0.028). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the performance of three behavioral tests. The treatment satisfaction and dropout rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions The treatment of cTBS over the bilateral SMA was safe and tolerable, and it could significantly improve the depression and anxiety of OCD patients but was not enough to improve OCD symptoms in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据