3.8 Proceedings Paper

Investigation of growth mode and surface roughness during homoepitaxial growth of silver metal using kinetic Monte Carlo simulation

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 459-465

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.582

关键词

Kintic Monte Carlo (KMC); Simulation; Homoepitaxial; Roughness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the homoepitaxial growth of silver metal is simulated using a kinetic Monte Carlo method. The effects of surface diffusion processes, the Schwoebel-Ehrlich mechanism, and substrate temperature and deposition rate on the growth mode and surface roughness are investigated in detail.
In this work, a kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) method for deposition is investigated to simulate the homoepitaxial growth of silver metal under experimental conditions. On-lattice and coarse-graining approximations are applied. KMC method is an ideal tool for simulating the Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) process, which involves deposition and diffusion. The method accounts for surface diffusion processes, in addition to nearest-neighbor hopping and including Schwoebel-Ehrlich (SE). The SE mechanism effect on the growth mode and influences of substrate temperature and deposition rate on surface roughness have been studied in detail. The simulation results show when the Schwoebel hops are active, the growth mode is Frank-van der Merwe (2D). Furthermore, when the Schwoebel hops are not active, the growth mode is Volmer-Weber (3D). In addition, when increasing the deposition rate, the surface roughness increases due to the size of islands increase. Besides, when the temperature increases, the surface roughness decreases because the islands formed are transformed into a large cluster.Copyright (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 4thInternational Conference on Advanced Materials for Photonics, Sensing and Energy Conversion Energy Applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据