4.8 Article

Asymmetric dearomative cyclopropanation of naphthalenes to construct polycyclic compounds

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 44, 页码 13015-13019

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2sc04509e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21472159, 21903059]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund [2021A1515012023]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [201901D111113, 201901D111109, 201901D211093]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [21620318, 2019QNGG22]
  5. Open Fund of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Functional Supramolecular Coordination Materials and Applications [2020B121201005]
  6. 100-Talent Program in Shanxi province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The asymmetric dearomative cyclopropanation of naphthalenes is a rapid method for constructing polycyclic compounds, with high yields and enantioselectivity. This reaction creates multiple stereogenic centers.
Catalytic asymmetric dearomatization (CADA) reactions is an important synthetic method for constructing enantioenriched complex cyclic systems from simple aromatic feedstocks. However, the CADA reactions of nonactivated arenes, such as naphthalenes and benzenes, have been far less explored than those of electronically activated arenes, such as phenols, naphthols and indoles. Herein, we disclose an asymmetric dearomative cyclopropanation of naphthalenes for the rapid construction of polycyclic compounds. With chiral dirhodium carboxylate as a catalyst, the dearomative cyclopropanation proceeded smoothly under mild conditions and afforded benzonorcaradiene-containing tetracycles in good yield and high enantioselectivity (up to 99% ee). Three stereogenic centers, including two all-carbon quaternary centers, were created in the dearomatization reaction. Moreover, a variety of functional groups are well-tolerated in the reaction. The products could be readily converted into other complex polycycles while maintaining the high ee value.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据