4.6 Article

Fire Safety in Museums: Simulation of Fire Scenarios for Development of Control Evacuation Schemes from the Winter Palace of the Hermitage

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings12101546

关键词

museum; computer simulation; fire safety; design; dangerous fire factors; ASET; RSET; evacuation; control

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [075-15-2021-1333]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This manuscript focuses on the evacuation problems in museums during a fire. It discusses the specific features of museums and their impact on safe evacuation conditions. The paper emphasizes the importance of evacuation management and the development of evacuation schemes to ensure the safety of museum visitors.
The manuscript is focused on the problems of evacuation in case of fire from the buildings of museums as places with a mass presence of people. Features specific to museums and how they affect safe evacuation conditions are discussed. Most attention is paid to evacuation management, since the vast majority of museum visitors are not familiar with the layout of the building. In this case, the actions of staff in evacuation management are decisive. The paper considers the development of evacuation schemes, taking into account the spread of fire hazards in the building and the development of instructions on their basis for the staff. Using the example of the Winter Palace of the State Hermitage Museum, the solution of the marked tasks with the use of computer simulation of evacuation during a fire is given. The analysis of the simulation results showed the vulnerabilities of the museum. In this work, the evacuation schemes for the scenarios are considered. The maximum number of visitors at a single time in the Winter Palace has been set at 4000. The principles of making evacuation schemes are formulated, including taking into account the peculiarities of space-planning solutions inherent in museums, such as enfilades and the connections of rooms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据