3.8 Article

Economic Analysis of Biogas Production via Biogas Digester Made from Composite Material

期刊

CHEMENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemengineering6050067

关键词

composite materials; biogas; biogas digester; economic analysis; economic indicator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the economic implications of using a biogas digester made from composite material. The findings show that using lower-cost materials increases cost effectiveness and sustainability. The economic analysis reveals an initial investment cost of USD 1623.41, with the potential to replace 33.2% of liquefied petroleum gas and generate approximately 9.42 kWh of electricity per day.
This study seeks to evaluate the economic implication of a biogas digester built from composite material to ascertain its cost effectiveness. The feasibility study conducted indicates that a brick made only of fixed dome digester costs between USD 3193.99 and USD 4471.59. This high cost is attributed to the construction material, thus prompting the need to use materials of lower cost for affordability and sustainability. Hence, the digester under study was made from composite material comprising high-density polyethylene (HDPE), bricks and cement. The inlet and outlet chambers were built using bricks and cement, while the digestion chamber was made from HDPE material. From the economic analysis conducted, the total initial investment cost of the biogas digester was reported to be USD 1623.41 with an internal rate of return (IRR) of 8.5%, discount payback period (DPP) of 2 years and net present value (NPV) of USD 1783.10. The findings equally revealed that the estimated quantity of biogas could replace 33.2% of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) cooking gas. Moreover, the biogas daily yield of 1.57 m(3) generates approximately 9.42 kWh of electricity, which costs about USD 1.54. Thus, the study recommends the use of composite material of plastics and bricks in constructing the biogas digester, as it is cost effective and sustainable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据