4.5 Article

Profiling Players Involved in Overkill: An Analysis of 71 Cases in Central Italy

期刊

HEALTHCARE
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101873

关键词

forensic pathology; forensic anthropology; overkill; homicide; victim; offender relationship; violence; offender profiling; victim profiling; injury quantification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overkill refers to the presence of excessive wounds on the victim's body with no clear definition. The study found that victims and perpetrators of overkill cases share similar characteristics, mainly being males aged between 20 and 50 years, with a peak in the 50-55 years age range for victims. The type of damage can be attributed to the sole action of a cold weapon or the simultaneous use of multiple harmful tools. The most common motive is a dispute for futile reasons.
Overkill is characterized by the finding of excessive wounds on the victim's body. Despite the large use of this term, it does not have a definition in the literature yet. Our study aimed to analyze the information related to the dynamics of overkill cases, collecting objective variables, and producing a profile of the players involved in this type of homicides. Data on 71 overkill cases from reports of the autopsies performed in the Section of Legal Medicine of the University of Rome Tor Vergata from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2020 were collected. The victims and the perpetrators of overkill shared similar characteristics: they were usually male aged between 20 and 50 years, more likely in the 20-35 years range; victims however also showed another age peak in the range 50-55 years. The type of damage can be linked to the sole action of a cold weapon or the simultaneous use of multiple harmful tools with no significant differences. The most common motive proved to be a dispute for futile reasons; however, in the case of a single perpetrator of the crime, the economic and passionate motives are as frequent as the previous one. Implications of the findings and avenues for future research are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据