4.5 Article

A New Energy-Efficient Coverage Control with Multinodes Redundancy Verification in Wireless Sensor Networks

期刊

JOURNAL OF SENSORS
卷 2016, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2016/2347267

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1304603, 61503174]
  2. Henan Province Education Department Natural Science Foundation [15A413016, 16A520063, 17A520044]
  3. Natural Science and Technology Research of Foundation Project of Henan Province Department of Science [152300410115, 152102410053, 162102210113, 162102210276, 162102410051]
  4. Guangzhou Education Bureau Science Foundation [1201430560]
  5. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China [2016A030313540]
  6. National Scholarship Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The target nodes are k-covered by the sensor nodes; there will be a lot of redundant data forcing the phenomenon of congestion which lowers the network communication capability and coverage and accelerates network energy consumption. Therefore, this paper proposes an energy-efficient coverage control with multinodes redundancy verification (ECMRV). The algorithm constructs the coverage network model by using the positional relationship among the sensor nodes, and the proof procedure of the sector coverage expected value of the monitoring area also has been provided. On the aspect of the energy consumption, this paper gives the proportion of energy conversion functions between the working sensor nodes and the neighboring sensor nodes. And by using the function proportional to schedule the sensor nodes with low energy, we achieve the energy balance of the whole network and the optimization of the network resources. Finally, the simulation experiments indicate that this algorithm can not only improve the quality of network coverage, but completely inhibit the rapid energy consumption of the sensor nodes as well; as a result, the network lifetime extends, which has verified availability and stability of the algorithm in the paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据