3.8 Proceedings Paper

Studying the Cost of n-qubit Toffoli Gates

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, ICCS 2022, PT IV
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 122-128

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-08760-8_10

关键词

Quantum circuits; Toffoli gate; n-qubit Toffoli gate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyses the known techniques for constructing multi-qubit Toffoli gates and the latest designs for the 2-qubit version. It focuses on the construction of a temporary logical-AND gate with more than two control qubits. The results are presented in comparative tables to facilitate researchers and interested individuals in choosing the design that suits their needs.
There are several Toffoli gate designs for quantum computers in the literature. Each of these designs is focused on a specific technology or on optimising one or several metrics (T-count, number of qubits, etc.), and therefore has its advantages and disadvantages. While there is some consensus in the state of the art on the best implementations for the Toffoli gate, scaling this gate for use with three or more control qubits is not trivial. In this paper, we analyse the known techniques for constructing an n-qubit Toffoli gate, as well as the existing state-of-the-art designs for the 2-qubit version, which is an indispensable building block for the larger gates. In particular, we are interested in a construction of the temporary logical-AND gate with more than two control qubits. This gate is widely used in the literature due to the T-count and qubit reduction it provides. However, its use with more than two control qubits has not been analysed in detail in any work. The resulting information is offered in the form of comparative tables that will facilitate its consultation for researchers and people interested in the subject, so that they can easily choose the design that best suits their interests. As part of this work, the studied implementations have been reproduced and tested on both quantum simulators and real quantum devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据