4.6 Article

Prediction of Shanghai Electric Power Carbon Emissions Based on Improved STIRPAT Model

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142013068

关键词

electric energy; carbon forecast; STIRPAT model; ridge regression; scenario analysis

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Control of Power Transmission and Conversion (SJTU), Ministry of Education [2022AA06]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51777126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study establishes a carbon emission prediction model for electric power energy based on the elastic relationship, providing an important guarantee for achieving low carbon and clean production.
Energy is the bridge connecting the economy and the environment and electric energy is an important guarantee for social production. In order to respond to the national dual-carbon goals, a new power system is being constructed. Effective carbon emission forecasts of power energy are essential to achieve a significant guarantee for low carbon and clean production of electric power energy. We analyzed the influencing factors of carbon emissions, such as population, per capita gross domestic product (GDP), urbanization rate, industrial structure, energy consumption, energy structure, regional electrification rate, and degree of opening to the outside world. The original Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) model was improved, and the above influencing factors were incorporated into the model for modeling analysis. The ridge regression algorithm was adopted to analyze the biased estimation of historical data. The carbon emission prediction model of Shanghai electric power and energy based on elastic relationship was established. According to the 14th Five-Year development plan for the Shanghai area, we set up the impact factor forecast under different scenarios to substitute into the forecast models. The new model can effectively assess the carbon emissions of the power sector in Shanghai in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据