4.7 Article

Quantum-inspired method for solving the Vlasov-Poisson equations

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 106, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.035208

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy
  2. [DE-SC0020264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the practicality of using matrix product state (MPS) methods to solve the Vlasov-Poisson equations for systems with one coordinate in space and one coordinate in velocity. The results show that important features of linear and nonlinear dynamics can be captured while compressing the solution significantly. By comparing the performance of different mappings of the distribution functions onto the MPS, the study provides insights into the behavior of MPS representation in solving the Vlasov-Poisson equations.
Kinetic simulations of collisionless (or weakly collisional) plasmas using the Vlasov equation are often infeasible due to high-resolution requirements and the exponential scaling of computational cost with respect to dimension. Recently, it has been proposed that matrix product state (MPS) methods, a quantum-inspired but classical algorithm, can be used to solve partial differential equations with exponential speed-up, provided that the solution can be compressed and efficiently represented as a MPS within some tolerable error threshold. In this work, we explore the practicality of MPS methods for solving the Vlasov-Poisson equations for systems with one coordinate in space and one coordinate in velocity, and find that important features of linear and nonlinear dynamics, such as damping or growth rates and saturation amplitudes, can be captured while compressing the solution significantly. Furthermore, by comparing the performance of different mappings of the distribution functions onto the MPS, we develop an intuition of the MPS representation and its behavior in the context of solving the Vlasov-Poisson equations, which will be useful for extending these methods to higher-dimensional problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据