4.6 Article

Environmentally Friendly Concrete Compressive Strength Prediction Using Hybrid Machine Learning

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142012990

关键词

machine learning; green concrete; python; catboost regressor; extra trees regressor; gradient boosting regressor; geopolymer concrete

资金

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [RS-2022-00154935]
  2. Institute for Industrial Technology Evaluation and Management (KEIT) [RS-2022-00154935]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To reduce the environmental impact of concrete, the development of eco-friendly and green alternatives is necessary. This study utilizes a machine learning approach to estimate the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete and demonstrates the potential of hybrid models to improve prediction accuracy.
In order to reduce the adverse effects of concrete on the environment, options for eco-friendly and green concretes are required. For example, geopolymers can be an economically and environmentally sustainable alternative to portland cement. This is accomplished through the utilization of alumina-silicate waste materials as a cementitious binder. These geopolymers are synthesized by activating alumina-silicate minerals with alkali. This paper employs a three-step machine learning (ML) approach in order to estimate the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. The ML methods include CatBoost regressors, extra trees regressors, and gradient boosting regressors. In addition to the 84 experiments in the literature, 63 geopolymer concretes were constructed and tested. Using Python language programming, machine learning models were built from 147 green concrete samples and four variables. Three of these models were combined using a blending technique. Model performance was evaluated using several metric indices. Both the individual and the hybrid models can predict the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete with high accuracy. However, the hybrid model is claimed to be able to improve the prediction accuracy by 13%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据