4.7 Article

One-loop correction to the enhanced curvature perturbation with local-type non-Gaussianity for the formation of primordial black holes

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 106, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063508

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFC2201502]
  2. NSFC [11975019, 119 91052, 12047503]
  3. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [ZDBS-LY-7009]
  4. CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research [YSBR-006]
  5. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDPB15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we calculate the one-loop correction to the curvature power spectrum with local-type non-Gaussianities. We find a perturbativity condition that provides a stringent constraint on the relevant inflation models for the formation of primordial black holes.
As one of the promising candidates of cold dark matter, primordial black holes (PBHs) were formed due to the collapse of overdense regions generated by the enhanced curvature perturbations during the radiation-dominated era. The enhanced curvature perturbations are expected to be non-Gaussian in some relevant inflation models, and hence, the higher-order loop corrections to the curvature power spectrum might be non-negligible as well as altering the abundance of PBHs. In this paper, we calculate the one-loop correction to the curvature power spectrum with local-type non-Gaussianities characterized by FNL and GNL standing for the quadratic and cubic non-Gaussian parameters, respectively. Requiring that the one -loop correction be subdominant, we find a perturbativity condition, namely, I2cAF2NL + 6AGNLI << 1, where c is a constant coefficient which can be explicitly calculated in the given model, and A denotes the variance of the Gaussian part of the enhanced curvature perturbation, and such a perturbativity condition can provide a stringent constraint on the relevant inflation models for the formation of PBHs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据