4.6 Article

Complete positive operator-valued measure description of multichannel quantum electro-optic sampling with monochromatic field modes

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 106, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.043713

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 1432]
  2. Baden-Wuerttemberg Stiftung
  3. [425217212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A multichannel quantum electro-optic sampling method is proposed for simultaneous measurements of different field quadratures and tuning interaction strengths. The probability distribution of the electro-optic signal outcomes is related to the indirectly measured MIR state. Consecutive measurements of (X) over cap and (Y) over cap quadratures can outperform eight-port homodyne detection.
We propose a multichannel version of quantum electro-optic sampling involving monochromatic field modes. It allows for multiple simultaneous measurements of arbitrarily many (X) over cap and (Y) over cap field quadratures for a single quantum-state copy, while independently tuning the interaction strengths at each channel. In contrast to standard electro-optic sampling, the sampled midinfrared (MIR) mode undergoes a nonlinear interaction with multiple near-infrared pump beams. We present a complete positive operator-valued measure description for quantum states in the MIR mode. The probability distribution of the electro-optic signal outcomes is shown to be related to an s-parametrized phase-space quasiprobability distribution of the indirectly measured MIR state, with the parameter s depending solely on the quantities characterizing the nonlinear interaction. Furthermore, we show that the quasiprobability distributions for the sampled and postmeasurement states are related to each other through a renormalization and a change in the parametrization. This result is then used to demonstrate that two consecutive measurements of both (X) over cap and (Y) over cap quadratures can outperform eight-port homodyne detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据