4.7 Article

Resolving the pathologies of self-interacting Proca fields: A case study of Proca stars

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 106, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.084022

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [20K14468, 17H06359]
  2. Portuguese national fund through the Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT)
  3. Centro de Astrofisica e Gravitacao (CENTRA) [UIDB/00099/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the issues of singular effective metric and gradient or ghost instabilities in a self-interacting massive vector field. The research finds that the singularity formation is not necessarily a fundamental problem, but a breakdown of the effective field theory (EFT) description. It is also discovered that the EFT description breaks before the onset of the ghost instability.
It has been argued that a self-interacting massive vector field is pathological due to a dynamical formation of a singular effective metric of the vector field, which is the onset of a gradient or ghost instability. We discuss that this singularity formation is not necessarily a fundamental problem but a breakdown of the effective field theory (EFT) description of the massive vector field. By using a model of ultraviolet (UV) completion of the massive vector field, we demonstrate that a Proca star, a self-gravitating condensate of the vector field, continues to exist even after the EFT suffers from a gradient instability without any pathology at UV, in which the EFT description is still valid and the gradient instability in EFT may be interpreted as a standard dynamical instability of a high-density boson star from the UV perspective. On the other hand, we find that the EFT description is broken before the ghost instability appears. This suggests that a heavy degree of freedom may be spontaneously excited to cure the pathology of the EFT as the EFT dynamically tends to approach the onset of the ghost instability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据