4.5 Article

Effect of Household Type on the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Korea: Using Propensity Score Matching

期刊

HEALTHCARE
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101894

关键词

KNHANES; household types; metabolic syndrome; propensity score matching

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the impact of household type on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Koreans. The results showed that household type had a certain influence on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, but it alone could not fully explain the differences in prevalence.
This study analyzed the effect of the household type on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Koreans utilizing data from the sixth, seventh, and eighth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys conducted by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency from 2015 to 2019. The demographic characteristics, metabolic syndrome characteristics according to household type, and risk factors of 25,092 subjects were identified using the Rao-Scott chi(2)-test and weighted multiple logistic regression results. Furthermore, to understand the effect of the household type on prevalence of metabolic syndrome, the selection bias between the groups was eliminated using the propensity score matching method. The average treatment effect for those treated for metabolic syndrome prior to propensity score matching was higher for single-person households, with 0.353 and 0.268 for single- and multi-person households, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). However, after propensity score matching, it was observed to be higher for multi-person households, with 0.290 and 0.316 for single- and multi-person households, respectively. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.1822). Difference was observed regarding the prevalence of metabolic syndrome by individual characteristics, some of which were considered in previous studies. However, the household type alone did not explain the prevalence of metabolic syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据