4.6 Article

Elastic Characterization of Shale at Microscale: A Comparison between Modulus Mapping, PeakForce Quantitative Nanomechanical Mapping, and Contact Resonance Method

期刊

SPE JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 3136-3157

出版社

SOC PETROLEUM ENG

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Hydrates
  2. [ZDSYS20200421111201738]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper systematically compares three commonly used micromechanical mapping methods and discusses their theoretical background and connections. Elastic characterization of shale was conducted on a shale sample from the Ordos Basin. The effects of scanning frequency, peak force frequency, and force setpoint were analyzed. The study also discussed the limitations of the data processing method and test methods. This work contributes to improved understanding and selection of micromechanical mapping methods and experimental design of elastic characterization of shale.
Because of the extremely high resolution and little damage to the sample, micromechanical mapping methods have been widely used for elastic characterization of shale at microscale. However, few studies have investigated connections and differences among commonly used micromechanical mapping methods. The influencing factors of micromechanical tests, such as sample preparation, experimental set-up, and data processing, have not yet been sufficiently discussed. In the presented paper, three representative micromechanical mapping methods, including modulus mapping (MM), PeakForce quantitative nanomechanical mapping (PFQNM), and contact resonance (CR) method, were systematically compared from theory to application. The fundamental principles of the three methods were introduced, and connections in theoretical background were discussed. A shale sample from the Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin was selected for elastic characterization. Mechanical tests were performed on a fixed area on the sample surface by using different methods. The modulus distribution images obtained by the three methods intuitively exhibited microheterogeneity in shale. The influences of scanning frequen-cy, peak force frequency, and force setpoint were analyzed based on the test results. The comparison of the contact area revealed that MM possessed the lowest spatial resolution with the experimental setup, and the CR method was less sensitive to the surface condition than PFQNM. The effectiveness of the data processing method was demonstrated through scale dependency analysis, and the limitations of the test methods were discussed. This work may contribute to improved understanding and selection of micromechanical mapping methods and experimental design of elastic characterization of shale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据