4.0 Article

Biochemical methane potential of three-phase olive mill solid waste: Influence of temperature and supplemental enzymes

期刊

CARBON RESOURCES CONVERSION
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 248-254

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crcon.2022.07.002

关键词

Three-phase olive mill solid waste; Biochemical methane potential; Mesophilic; Thermophilic; Anaerobic digestion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The methane potential of three-phase olive mill solid waste (3POMSW) was evaluated, and thermophilic processing was found to result in higher methane and biogas yield. The addition of enzyme mixtures showed potential for increasing methane production. Simple model equations were developed for calculating biogas yield and optimizing the process.
Methane potential of three-phase olive mill solid waste (3POMSW) was evaluated by biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests at temperatures of 37.5 degrees C and 55 degrees C. The results have shown, that thermophilic processing has a higher methane and biogas yield by 10% and 17.2%, respectively, compared to mesophilic conditions. Concluding thermophilic conditions of 3POMSW results in higher conversion of the feedstock into biogas. The result of addition of enzymes (MethaPlus, Hemicellulase, PectinaseL, Amylase S and Lipase) and their mixtures to 3POMSW at 55 degrees C has shown that the optimum mixture of enzymes was Metha Plus and Hemicellulase, which resulted in an increase of methane yield by 1.3% compared to the base case without addition of enzymes. Simple model equations were developed based on first-order kinetic in order to calculate the biogas yield versus the time as a function of reaction rate constant (k) and the maximum biogas yield (y(max)). In this study, results have shown two different reaction rates obtained for the mixtures of enzymes with 3POMSW of 0.130 d(-1) from t = 0...14 days and 0.034 d(-1) from t = 28...63 days. The developed simple model equations can be applied for calculating the biogas yield at the time and by optimizing the process improving biological nutrient removal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据