Impact of Regulatory Approval Status on CADTH Reimbursement of Oncology Drugs and Role of Real-World Evidence on Conditional Approvals from 2019 to 2021

Real-world evidence (RWE) is health and outcomes data generated from a patient's journey through the health care system or disease process (i.e., real-world data). RWE is now having an increasingly important role in regulatory/reimbursement decisions. This article examines reimbursement recommendations by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (CADTH) on oncology drugs approved between 2019 and 2021. Oncology drugs with a Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) for original marketing approvals were used to generate a corresponding list of CADTH final clinical recommendations for review. Of the 45 oncology drugs approved by Health Canada, CADTH granted positive funding recommendations to all 11 drugs that had priority review approvals. Two of the 17 drugs with standard reviews did not file to CADTH and 3 received a negative recommendation. Of the 17 drugs with Notice of Compliance with Conditions (NOCc) status, three were not filed to CADTH and four were under active reviews. Of the ten completed NOCc reviews, all contained RWE from sponsors and six received a negative decision on their first review. No significant differences in review times were found between the three approval statuses. Regulatory approval status appeared to influence reimbursement outcomes in Canada and evaluation of 10 NOCc approvals provided little insight regarding robustness of RWE required for more favorable considerations.

Automated summary

This article examines reimbursement recommendations by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (CADTH) on oncology drugs approved between 2019 and 2021. CADTH granted positive funding recommendations to all 11 drugs that had priority review approvals, while 2 of the 17 drugs with standard reviews did not submit to CADTH and 3 received negative recommendations.