4.7 Article

Transcriptional response of porcine skeletal muscle to feeding a linseed-enriched diet to growing pigs

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40104-016-0064-1

关键词

Linseed; mRNA expression; n-3 PUFAs; Skeletal muscle

资金

  1. National Program on Key Basic research Project [2012CB127305]
  2. Hubei Provincial Creative Team Project of Agricultural Science and Technology [2007-620]
  3. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2013CFA010]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013PY047, 2013QC004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To investigate the effect of feeding a linseed-enriched diet to growing-finishing pigs on gene expression in skeletal muscle, pigs were fed with a linseed-enriched diet for 0, 30, 60 and 90 d. Transcriptional profiles of longissimus dorsi muscle were measured using Affymetrix Genechip. Results: Results showed that 264 genes were identified as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The strongest transcriptional response was clearly observed at 30 d. DEGs were assigned to several main functional terms, including transcription, apoptosis, intracellular receptor-mediated signaling, muscle organ development, fatty acid metabolic process, cell motion, regulation of glucose metabolic process, spermatogenesis and regulation of myeloid cell differentiation. We also found that transcriptional changs of several transcription cofactors might contribute to n-3 PUFAs regulated gene expression. In addition, the increased expression of IGF-1, insulin signaling pathway and the metabolism of amino acids might involve in the muscle growth induced by feeding a linseed enriched diet. The results also provide the new evidence that the expression changes of PTPN1, HK2 and PGC-1a might contribute to the regulation of insulin sensitivity by n-3 PUFAs. Conclusions: Our finding provided correlative evidence that feeding the linseed enriched diet affact expression of genes involved in insulin signaling pathway and the metabolism of amino acids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据