4.6 Article

Variational quantum eigensolver ansatz for the J1-J2-model

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 106, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.144426

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research via the funding program quantum technologies - from basic research to the market
  2. Bavarian state government
  3. Hightech Agenda Bayern Plus
  4. [13N15684]
  5. [13N15577]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ground state properties of the J1-J2 model are difficult to analyze using classical numerical methods due to frustration. We propose a variational quantum eigensolver ansatz to approximate the ground state of the model and demonstrate that it can simplify quantum computations and scale linearly with lattice size.
The ground state properties of the two-dimensional J1 -J2-model are very challenging to analyze via classical numerical methods due to the high level of frustration. This makes the model a promising candidate for which quantum computers could be helpful to possibly explore regimes that classical computers cannot reach. The J1 -J2-model is a quantum spin model composed of Heisenberg interactions along the rectangular lattice edges and along diagonal edges between next-nearest-neighbor spins. We propose an ansatz for the variational quantum eigensolver to approximate the ground state of an antiferromagnetic J1 -J2 Hamiltonian for different lattice sizes and different ratios of J1 and J2. Moreover, we demonstrate that this ansatz can work without the need for gates along the diagonal next-nearest-neighbor interactions. This simplification is of great importance for solid-state -based hardware with qubits on a rectangular grid, where it eliminates the need for SWAP gates. In addition, we provide an extrapolation for the number of gates and parameters needed for larger lattice sizes, showing that these are expected to grow linearly in the qubit number up to lattice sizes which eventually can no longer be treated with classical computers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据