3.8 Proceedings Paper

Can We Detect T Cell Receptors from Long-Read RNA-Seq Data?

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-07802-6_38

关键词

TCR detection; Oxford Nanopore Sequencing; Long reads

资金

  1. European Social Fund [POWR.03.02.00-00-I029]
  2. Silesian University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of utilizing existing methods for TR sequence annotation in long-read sequencing data. TRUST4 algorithm detected the largest number of CDR3 sequences, MiXCR and TRUST4 algorithms showed the same distribution in annotated V and J genes, which can be used to analyze the repertoire of V/J genes used in rearranged TR genes.
T cells play an essential role in defense of the organism against pathogens and cancer. Efficient protection requires a vast repertoire of immune receptors, which is created by the V(D)J recombination process. There are multiple algorithms designed for the annotation of recombined T cell receptor (TR) sequences from traditional (short-read) RNA-Seq, however, none is adjusted for the long-read data. Here we intend to examine whether existing methods for TR sequences annotation using traditional RNA-Seq can be utilized for long-read sequencing data. ImReP, TRUST4, CATT and MiXCR algorithms were applied to data obtained by nanopore technology (PromethION). Adjustment of parameters was performed. The biggest number of CDR3 sequences was detected by the TRUST4 algorithm (20,599 unique TR sequences out of 73,904,478 total reads), representing 25% of the expected number of sequences. The distribution of annotated V and J genes was the same for MiXCR and TRUST4 algorithms and may be used to analyze the repertoire of V/J gene used in rearranged TR genes. Due to the high sequencing error rate of the analyzed sample (median read quality Q = 6.9), TR clonotype analysis is not suggested, and additional error correction steps are recommended for such analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据