4.1 Article

Assessment of malformations, variations and diameters of vessels forming the circle of Willis - An autopsy study in a non-cerebrovascular cohort

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 398-406

出版社

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP Z O O
DOI: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0253

关键词

circle of Willis; autopsy; diameter; configuration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the variations and vessel diameters of the circle of Willis in a Central European cohort. The results showed that complete circle of Willis was present in more than 60% of patients without a history of stroke.
Background a purpose The collateral capacity of the circle of Willis (CoW) may play an important role in the development of ischemic strokes. The occurrence of classical polygon shows wide geographical variations and morphological data on diameters of the Willisian collaterals are scarce. We aimed to assess CoW variations and vessel diameters in a Central European cohort. Subjects and methods CoWs were removed during routine autopsy. The morphological pattern of the circles was recorded. The prepared circles were then put between two glass plates and tightly compressed. The length of the vessels and half of the circumference were measured under a light microscope enabling measurement with an approximation of 0.1 mm. Vessel diameters were calculated from vessel circumference. Results A total of 110 circles were analysed. Incomplete circles (missing one or two segments of CoW) were found in 25 cases (22.7%). Any forms of anatomical variations were detected in 14 cases (12.7%). When applying the <1 mm diameter threshold for analysis, 36 anterior communicating arteries (32.7%), 53 right posterior communicating arteries (48.2%), 73 left posterior communicating arteries (66.4%) and 18 posterior communicating arteries (16.3%) on both the sides were considered hypoplastic. Conclusions In patients without stroke in their history, complete CoW may be present in >60% of the cases. Our diameter data may serve as reference values for the Central-European population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据