4.5 Article

Large-Nc constraints for elastic dark-matter-light-nucleus scattering in pionless effective field theory

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 106, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.044003

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0019647, DE-FG02-05ER41368]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - DFG within the German Excellence Strategy [EXC 2118/1, 39083149]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019647] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent proposals for the use of light nuclei as dark-matter direct detection targets require a strong theoretical understanding of nuclear physics. Calculations for dark-matter-light-nucleus scattering are performed using pionless effective field theory and large-N-c expansion. Constraints for the relative sizes of dark-matter couplings to different nucleon currents are obtained through the large-N-c expansion, and used to predict the relative sizes of spin-dependent and spin-independent cross sections for dark-matter scattering off various light nuclei.
Recent proposals for the use of light nuclei as dark-matter direct detection targets necessitate a strong theoretical understanding of the nuclear physics involved. We perform relevant calculations for dark-matter- light-nucleus scattering in a combined pionless effective field theory and large-N-c expansion, where N-c is the number of quark colors. We include a general set of one-nucleon currents that have been used in other effective theories, as well as novel two-nucleon contact currents. First, we obtain constraints for the relative sizes of the dark-matter couplings to the one- and two-nucleon currents through the large-N-c expansion. Then, we use these constraints to make predictions for the relative sizes of spin-dependent and spin-independent cross sections for dark-matter scattering off of a nucleon, a deuteron, a triton, and helium-3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据