4.6 Article

Dynamic compression of [100] MgF2 single crystals: Shock-induced polymorphism to highly coordinated structures

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 106, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.144108

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003957]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AX2-type compounds exhibit a rich and complex series of phase transitions under compression. MgF2, as an analog for SiO2 and other dioxides, shows elastic-inelastic response and phase transformations at different stress ranges. The study provides important insights into the pressure behavior and phase transition mechanisms of AX2-type compounds.
AX2-type compounds exhibit a rich and complex series of phase transitions under compression. The high-pressure polymorphism of rutile-type AX2 difluorides can be characterized by a typical sequence from rutile type CaCl2 type HP-PdF2 type cotunnite type. Relative to dioxides, the reduced valence and ionic radius of the F- anion in rutile-type MgF2 (sellaite) results in lowered transition pressures, making it a useful analog for SiO2 and other dioxides. In this work, MgF2 single crystals were shock-compressed along the [100] direction to 24 to 120 GPa using plate impact techniques, and wave profiles were measured using laser interferometry. At low stresses (24 to 44 GPa), we observe features consistent with an elastic-inelastic response, followed by a phase transformation. Peak stress-density states in this stress range are consistent with those expected for the modified fluorite-type (HP-PdF2) phase or a related structure. At higher stresses (69 to 91 GPa), we observe a two-wave structure with peak stress-density states consistent with transformation to a denser and likely more highly coordinated phase such as the cotunnite-type structure. At 120 GPa, only a single wave structure is observed, indicating that the wave profile features observed at lower stresses are overdriven.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据