4.6 Article

Reducing temperature swing of space objects with temperature-adaptive solar or radiative coating

期刊

CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101066

关键词

-

资金

  1. US NSF [ECCS-1953803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In outer space, objects without thermal control experience large temperature swings due to the lack of an atmosphere for temperature neutralization. However, the existing high-performance temperature management technologies impose additional burden on spacecrafts. Recently, temperature-adaptive solar coatings and temperature-adaptive radiative coatings have emerged as promising lightweight, energy-free temperature-regulation approaches for terrestrial objects. Through simulation, it is shown that these coatings have great potential as passive temperature management technologies for space objects.
Lacking the atmosphere for temperature neutralization, objects in outer space without thermal control undergo large temperature swings. Effective temperature management technologies (TMTs) are essential to avoid undesirable effects caused by extreme thermal conditions. However, existing high-performance TMTs impose additional burden on the limited mass and power budgets of spacecrafts. Very recently, temperature-adaptive solar coatings (TASCs) and temperature-adaptive radiative coatings (TARCs) emerged as novel light-weight, energy-free temperature-regulation approaches for terrestrial objects with excellent thermal performance. Here, we simulate and present the great potential of TASCs and TARCs as future passive TMTs for space objects. A case study of a geosynchronous satellite with body-mounted solar panels covered by TARC exhibits an interior temperature swing as small as 20.3 degrees C-25.45 degrees C in an orbital period even with solar eclipses. These findings provide insight into the superior performance of TASCs and TARCs in space and will promote their application in extraterrestrial missions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据