4.4 Review

Artificial intelligence to predict oncological outcome directly from hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides in urology

期刊

MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
卷 74, 期 5, 页码 538-550

出版社

EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04758-9

关键词

Deep learning; Urology; Prognosis; Pathology; Urogenital neoplasms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise in automatic tumor detection and grading in histopathological image analysis in urologic oncology. This review aimed to assess the applicability of these approaches in image-based oncological outcome prediction. The included studies demonstrate the potential of AI approaches, but further well-designed studies are needed to evaluate their clinical applicability.
INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been successfully applied for automatic tumor detection and grading in histopathological image analysis in urologic oncology. The aim of this review was to assess the applicability of these approaches in image-based oncological outcome prediction. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases MEDLINE through PubMed and Web of Science up to April 20, 2021. Studies investigating AI approaches to determine the risk of recur-rence, metastasis, or survival directly from H&E-stained tissue sections in prostate, renal cell or urothelial carcinoma were included. Characteristics of the AI approach and performance metrics were extracted and summarized. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the PROBAST tool. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: 16 studies yielding a total of 6658 patients and reporting on 17 outcome predictions were included. Six studies focused on renal cell, six on prostate and three on urothelial carcinoma while one study investigated renal cell and urothelial carcinoma. Handcrafted feature extraction was used in five, a convolutional neural network (CNN) in six and a deep feature extraction in four studies. One study compared a CNN with handcrafted feature extrac-tion. In seven outcome predictions, a multivariable comparison with clinicopathological parameters was reported. Five of them showed statistically significant hazard ratios for the AI's model's-prediction. However, RoB was high in 15 outcome predictions and unclear in two. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies are promising but predominantly early pilot studies, therefore primarily highlight-ing the potential of AI approaches. Additional well-designed studies are needed to assess the actual clinical applicability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据