3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Method for Integrated Modeling of KiPs and Contextual Goals

期刊

COOPERATIVE INFORMATION SYSTEMS (COOPIS 2022)
卷 13591, 期 -, 页码 322-332

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-17834-4_20

关键词

Knowledge-intensive process; Enterprise modeling; Goal modeling; Process modeling; Context

资金

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [825925]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [825925] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knowledge-intensive processes (KiPs) are flexible in achieving process goals. Contextual factors such as location and regulations impact how these goals are achieved in KiPs. For some KiPs, the context can be dynamic, meaning that it can change during the execution of the process based on the decisions and interpretations of the knowledge-worker. A holistic approach that links dynamic context, goals, and processes is crucial in modeling such KiPs. This paper presents a method for integrated modeling of KiPs with contextual goals under dynamic contexts, using enterprise models.
Knowledge-intensive processes (KiPs) progress in a flexible way towards the achievement of process goals. Contextual factors like location and regulations affect how these goals are achieved in KiPs. Conventionally, a context is considered to be either static or dynamic. For some KiPs part of the context can be dynamic, meaning that the context can change during the execution of the KiP as a result of the decisions and interpretations of the knowledge-worker based on the information gained throughout the process. A holistic approach linking dynamic context, goals and processes is vital for modeling such KiPs. This paper presents a method, based on enterprise models, for integrated modeling of KiPs with contextual goals under dynamic contexts. With our method, we guide business analysts in modeling complex, flexible KiPs under dynamic contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据