4.1 Article

A preliminary fish survey of the estuaries on the east coast of South Africa, Mpande to Mtentwana: a comparative study

期刊

WATER SA
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 394-412

出版社

WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION
DOI: 10.17159/wsa/2022.v48.i4.3944

关键词

ichthyofauna; estuarine survey; fish habitat; northern Transkei

资金

  1. Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A preliminary survey was conducted to study the fish communities and physico-chemical characteristics of estuaries along the east coast of South Africa. The estuaries were classified into three types based on their size and openness. Significant differences were found in both physico-chemical characteristics and fish communities among the estuary types. The estuaries in the study area were located in the subtropical/warm-temperate transition zone and were dominated by tropical fish species.
A preliminary ichthyofaunal and physico-chemical survey of estuaries on the east coast of South Africa from the Mpande Estuary to the Mtentwana Estuary was undertaken between November 1997 and January 1998. Sixteen estuaries were surveyed along this stretch of coastline and these were grouped into three estuary types: small (< 10 ha) predominantly closed estuaries, moderate to large (> 10 ha) predominantly closed estuaries and predominantly open estuaries. Multivariate analyses revealed significant differences between the three groups in terms of both their physico-chemical characteristics (small predominantly closed estuaries were different from predominantly open estuaries) and their fish communities (all three estuary types were significantly different). The estuaries in the study area fall within the subtropical/warm-temperate transition-zone and north of the subtropical/warm-temperate biogeographic break; tropical species dominated the fish communities of all the estuaries in terms of numbers of species and biomass. This survey represents one of the few fish surveys undertaken along this little-studied section of the coastline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据