4.2 Article

Nutritional and functional characterisation of flour from six plantain (Musa spp.) cultivars grown in Benin br

期刊

INTERNATIONAL FOOD RESEARCH JOURNAL
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 1101-1109

出版社

UNIV PUTRA MALAYSIA PRESS
DOI: 10.47836/ifrj.29.5.12

关键词

plantain; vitamin C; swelling power; fl-carotene; viscosity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plantain flour is a promising functional ingredient in the food industry, with different functional properties and nutritional compositions. Flours from different plantain cultivars have varied physicochemical and functional properties, making them suitable for various food domains.
Plantain flour is a promising functional ingredient of various domains in the food industry. The present work investigated the functional attributes and proximate composition of flours derived from six plantain cultivars from Benin, and evaluated their nutritional composition. Among the cultivars, proximate composition of the flours varied in moisture, ash, protein, and fibre ranging from 4.59 -6.85, 2.01 -2.56, 2.54 -3.47, and 0.95 -1.37% (dry basis), respectively. Significantly higher 0-carotene contents (+/- 9 mu g) were found in flours from Orishele and Pelipita cultivars, whereas flours from Aloga 2M and Kpahissi cultivars yielded the highest content of vitamin C (9.64 mu g). Flour from Kpahissi cultivar exhibited higher water and oil absorption capacity (161.29 and 81.29%, respectively) than the other flours. In addition, higher viscosity, emulsion, and foaming capacities were recorded in flour from Kpahissi cultivar. Flours from different plantain cultivars differed in their physicochemical and functional properties, and could, therefore, be used in various food domains. In that respect, Kpahissi, Orishele, and Aloga 2M flours could be more suitable in the formulation of particular composite flour for specific uses having good functional parameters such as water and oil absorption, viscosity, emulsion, and foaming capacities.(c) All Rights Reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据