4.6 Article

Femtosecond aser direct writing 3D micro/nano-lithography using VIS-light oscillator

期刊

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 3270-3276

出版社

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-5153-z

关键词

laser direct writing; two-photon polymerization; multi-photon lithography; 3D printing; additive manufacturing; SZ2080 (TM); microstructures; nanotechnology

资金

  1. Research Council of Lithuania [S-MIP-20-17]
  2. EU Horizon 2020, Research and Innovation program LASERLAB-EUROPE JRA [871124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel femtosecond laser direct writing method was reported, which can structure pre-polymers without using photo-initiators. The experimental work is of high importance for widening the applications of laser additive manufacturing.
Here we report a femtosecond laser direct writing (a precise 3D printing also known as two-photon polymerization lithography) of hybrid organic-inorganic SZ2080 (TM) pre-polymer without using any photo-initiator and applying similar to 100 fs oscillator operating at 517 nm wavelength and 76 MHz repetition rate. The proof of concept was experimentally demonstrated and benchmarking 3D woodpile nanostructures, micro-scaffolds, free-form micro-object Benchy and bulk micro-cubes are successfully produced. The essential novelty underlies the fact that non-amplified laser systems delivering just 40 - 500 pJ individual pulses are sufficient for inducing localized cross-linking reactions within hundreds of nanometers in cross sections. And it is opposed to the prejudice that higher pulse energies and lower repetition rates of amplified lasers are necessary for structuring non-photosensitized polymers. The experimental work is of high importance for fundamental understanding of laser enabled nanoscale 3D additive manufacturing and widens technology's field of applications where the avoidance of photo-initiator is preferable or is even a necessity, such as micro-optics, nano-photonics, and biomedicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据