3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Blockchain-based Data Market for Renewable Energy Forecasts

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/BCCA55292.2022.9922150

关键词

Hyperledger Fabric; Data Market; Energy Forecasts

资金

  1. ERDF -European Regional Development Fund, through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation - COMPETE 2020 Programme under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement
  2. National Funds through the FCT -Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. [POCI-01-0247-FEDER-045907]
  3. National Funds through the Portuguese funding agency, CT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P. [UIDB/50014/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a data market that aims to trade energy forecasts data using blockchain as a service for system architecture. Settlement of the data, presented as a commodity, is done through blockchain based on the extracted value provided by market stakeholders. The study shows that the data market design is effective and the data market architecture is scalable.
This paper presents a data market aimed at trading energy forecasts data. The system architecture is built using blockchain as a service, allowing access to data streams and establishing a distributed settlement between stakeholders. Energy Forecasts data is presented as the commodity traded in the market, whose settlement is provided through the blockchain on the basis of the extracted value provided by market stakeholders. Our proposal allows market stakeholders to acquire energy forecasts and pay according to the data accuracy, solving the confidentiality problem of freely sharing data. A data quality reward is introduced, steering the compensation sent to market participants. The data market design is presented and an evaluation campaign is performed, showing that the data market produced functionally valid results in comparison with the results achieved with a central simulated approach. Moreover, results show that the data market architecture is able to scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据