Relevance of prokaryotic subspecies in the age of genomics

The availability of multiple gene sequences, and in particular full genome sequence data, for microbial strains has changed how taxonomists delineate subspecies belonging to the Archaea and Bacteria. Well-defined phylogenetic lineages that share higher genome similarity values compared to the widely used species thresholds are often described as subspecies, despite clear evidence of genetic isolation between them. These well-defined lineages, reflecting notable genetic isolation of the core genome represent more recently evolved, unique and sui generis evolutionary units. Because they bear all of the hallmarks of species, most contemporary subspecies likely represent species in their own right. Although there is considerable value in defining intraspecies variation (e.g., pathovar, serovar and symbiovar), the discriminating properties of such units are mostly encoded on accessory subgenomic compartments. We therefore argue that the taxonomic category of subspecies has become irrelevant and propose that its use should be discontinued. This will minimize inconsistencies related to the subjective nature of species-subspecies distinctions. Formal recognition of biologically relevant variation within species based on the accessory genome information will have practical significance in fields such as clinical, industrial and agricultural microbiology. (c) 2022 University of Pretoria. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Automated summary

The availability of multiple gene sequences has changed how taxonomists delineate microbial subspecies, and full genome sequence data is particularly important. Well-defined lineages with high genome similarity values are often described as subspecies, despite clear evidence of genetic isolation. The taxonomic category of subspecies has become irrelevant and its use should be discontinued. Variation within species based on the accessory genome information is biologically significant.