4.6 Article

Transmembrane domain of IFITM3 is responsible for its interaction with influenza virus HA2 subunit

期刊

VIROLOGICA SINICA
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 664-675

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.virs.2022.07.002

关键词

Interferon-inducible transmembrane protein 3; (IFITM3); Influenza virus; Hemagglutinin (HA); Interaction; Transmembrane domain

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences
  3. [31702210]
  4. [31972719]
  5. [2020 - 12M-5-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals a direct interaction between IFITM3 and influenza HA protein via the transmembrane domain, shedding light on the biological significance of IFITM3 in restricting influenza virus infection or HA-mediated antagonism or escape.
Interferon-inducible transmembrane protein 3 (IFITM3) inhibits influenza virus infection by blocking viral membrane fusion, but the exact mechanism remains elusive. Here, we investigated the function and key region of IFITM3 in blocking influenza virus entry mediated by hemagglutinin (HA). The restriction of IFITM3 on HA-mediated viral entry was confirmed by pseudovirus harboring HA protein from H5 and H7 influenza viruses. Subcellular co-localization and immunocoprecipitation analyses revealed that IFITM3 partially co-located with the full-length HA protein and could directly interact with HA2 subunit but not HA1 subunit of H5 and H7 virus. Truncated analyses showed that the transmembrane domain of the IFITM3 and HA2 subunit might play an important role in their interaction. Finally, this interaction of IFITM3 was also verified with HA2 subunits from other subtypes of influenza A virus and influenza B virus. Overall, our data demonstrate for the first time a direct interaction between IFITM3 and influenza HA protein via the transmembrane domain, providing a new perspective for further exploring the biological significance of IFITM3 restriction on influenza virus infection or HA-mediated antagonism or escape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据