3.8 Proceedings Paper

Potential of mobile applications in human-centric production and logistics management

期刊

IFAC PAPERSONLINE
卷 55, 期 10, 页码 151-156

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.382

关键词

App; Mobile application; Smart device; Human factors; Systematic literature review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing market penetration of smart devices, mobile applications have become essential tools in daily life and industrial work. However, the limitations of smart devices require validation experiments to ensure the reliability of app usage, and more research is needed on the psychosocial aspects of human-technology interaction.
With the increasing market penetration of smart devices (smartphones, smartwatches, and tablets), various mobile applications (apps) have been developed to fulfill tasks in daily life. Recently, efforts have been made to develop apps to support human operators in industrial work. When apps installed on commercial devices are utilized, tasks that were formerly done purely manually or with the help of investment-intensive specific devices can be performed more efficiently and/or at a lower cost and with reduced errors. Despite their advantages, smart devices have limitations because embedded sensors (e.g., accelerometers) and components (e.g., cameras) are usually designed for nonindustrial use. Hence, validation experiments and case studies for industrial applications are needed to ensure the reliability of app usage. In this study, a systematic literature review was employed to identify the state of knowledge about the use of mobile apps in production and logistics management. The results show how apps can support human centricity based on the enabling technologies and components of smart devices. An outlook for future research and applications is provided, including the need for proper validation studies to ensure the diversity and reliability of apps and more research on psychosocial aspects of human-technology interaction. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据