3.8 Article

Pyrolysis of High Volatile C Bituminous Coal under the Action of Nanosecond Laser Radiation

期刊

EURASIAN CHEMICO-TECHNOLOGICAL JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 173-181

出版社

INST HIGHER EDUCATION ACAD SCI
DOI: 10.18321/ectj1430

关键词

Coal; Gaseous products; Laser; Pyrolysis; Mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [22-13-20041]
  2. Kemerovo Region - Kuzbass [2 of 22.03.2022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of pulsed nanosecond laser radiation on high volatile C bituminous coal in an argon medium. The results show that the volume of combustible gases formed increases with the power density of the laser, but remains almost unchanged at higher power densities. Additionally, the presence of a binding material in the tableted samples also influences the effect of laser radiation.
The effect of pulsed nanosecond laser radiation (wavelength 532 nm, pulse duration 14 ns, pulse repetition frequency 6 Hz, the density of laser radiation power 0.2-0.6 J/cm2) on the tableted samples of high volatile C bituminous coal in argon medium is investigated. Among the gaseous products of pyrolysis, H2, CH4, C2H2, CO and CO2 are detected. The volume fractions of gaseous products from sample pyrolysis depending on the laser radiation power density is established. Within the laser radiation power density range 0.2-0.4 J/cm2, the volume of the formed combustible gases per unit mass of the reacted sample increases, and remains almost unchanged with further increase in power density. The volume fraction of combustible gases in the mixture of gaseous pyrolysis products are only slightly dependent on the laser radiation power density. The action of nanosecond laser radiation with a power density of more than 0.4 J/cm2 causes intense ablation of the tableted sample containing 0.005 wt.%. polyvinyl alcohol. A tableted sample containing no binding material is destroyed under the action of nanosecond laser radiation with a power density of more than 0.2 J/cm2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据