4.7 Article

Intrinsic asymmetries in semi-inclusive deeply inelastic scattering at the Electron-Ion Collider

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 106, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.093003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
  2. [ZR2021QA015]
  3. [ZR2021QA040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we calculate the production of neutral current jets in semi-inclusive deeply inelastic scattering. We find that the asymmetry of these jets can be expressed in terms of transverse momentum-dependent parton distribution functions and electroweak couplings. These calculations provide new quantities for analyzing the distribution of partons and electroweak couplings, aiding in the understanding of weak and strong interactions in deeply inelastic scattering.
We calculate the neutral current jet production semi-inclusive deeply inelastic scattering process in this paper. Neutral current implies that interactions can be mediated by the photon, Z degrees boson, and their interference. The initial electron is assumed to be polarized and then scattered off by a target particle with spin 1/2. Calculations are carried out up to twist-3 level in the quantum chromodynamics parton model by applying the collinear expansion formalism where multiple gluon scattering is taken into account and gauge links are obtained automatically. After obtaining the differential cross section, we introduce the definition of the intrinsic asymmetry. This quantity reveals the asymmetry in the distribution of the quark intrinsic transverse momentum. We find that these asymmetries can be expressed in terms of the transverse momentum-dependent parton distribution functions and the electroweak couplings. As a result, our calculations provide a set of new quantities for analyzing the parton distribution functions and the electroweak couplings. It is helpful to understand the hadronic weak interactions and strong interactions in the deeply inelastic scattering process simultaneously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据