4.8 Article

High-yield dairy cattle breeds improve farmer incomes, curtail greenhouse gas emissions and reduce dairy import dependency in Tanzania

期刊

NATURE FOOD
卷 3, 期 11, 页码 957-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s43016-022-00633-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. International Fund for Agricultural Development within the 'Greening Livestock: Incentive-Based Interventions for Reducing the Climate Impact of Livestock in East Africa' project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Promoting improved Bos taurus x Bos indicus crosses is crucial for Tanzania to achieve dairy self-sufficiency, reduce dairy import dependency, lower greenhouse gas emissions, increase dairy producers' incomes, and support food sovereignty and commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Promoting higher-than-historical adoption rates of improved Bos taurus x Bos indicus crosses is essential to meet Tanzania's Dairy Development Roadmap targets and achieve dairy self-sufficiency by 2030. Tanzania's dairy sector is poorly developed, creating reliance on imports for processed, value-added dairy products and threatening food security, particularly when supply chains are disrupted due to market volatility or armed conflicts. The Tanzanian Dairy Development Roadmap is a domestic development initiative that aims to achieve dairy self-sufficiency by 2030. Here, we model different outcomes of the roadmap, finding that adoption of high-yield cattle breeds is essential for reducing dairy import dependency. Avoided land use change resulting from fewer, higher yielding dairy cattle would lead to lower greenhouse gas emissions. Dairy producers' average incomes could increase despite capital expenditure and land allocation required for the adoption of high-yield breeds. Our findings demonstrate the importance of bottom-up development policies for sustainable food system transformations, which also support food sovereignty, increase incomes for smallholder farmers and contribute towards Tanzania's commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据