4.6 Article

Achieving synergistic improvement in dielectric constant and energy storage properties of all-organic liquid crystal molecule/PVDF composites

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 10, 期 46, 页码 17757-17767

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2tc03556a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hunan National Natural Science Foundation
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, Changsha, China
  4. [2021JJ30652]
  5. [52002404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By selecting a low-cost liquid crystal small molecule as the organic filler, a series of polyvinylidene fluoride-based composite films with high dielectric constant and discharge energy density are prepared through a simple solvent casting method.
It is an urgent issue to enhance the energy storage capacity of dielectric film capacitors for their miniaturization and integration into lightweight electronic devices under the premise of large-scale industrial production. In this work, via selecting a low-cost liquid crystal small molecule (4-cyano-4 '-pentylbiphenyl, denoted as 5CB) as the organic filler, a series of all-organic poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based (PVDF) composite films are prepared through a simple solvent casting method. The 5CB organic filler with high liquid mobility and strong polarity can mix and interact well with the PVDF matrix, thus forming dense and high-quality dielectric polymer films. As a result, the 5 wt% 5CB/PVDF composite exhibits the highest dielectric constant of 9.8 at 1 kHz because of its great dispersibility and strong interfacial polarization. More importantly, a maximum discharge energy density of 11.7 J cm(-3) is obtained due to the increased crystallinity, the formation of charge traps and enhanced mechanical properties, which is more than 3 times that of a pristine PVDF film (3.8 J cm(-3)). This work is viable for large-scale preparation of high performance flexible dielectric composites via a simple and inexpensive method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据