4.3 Article

Diversity, phenology and voltinism of Chironomidae (Diptera). Neotropical streams as a study model

期刊

出版社

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202220200314

关键词

Chironomid Pupal Exuviae Technique (CPET); assemblage dynamics; emergence; patterns; seasonal synchronisation; Neotropical Region

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional del Litoral [50420150100016]
  2. Universidad Nacional de La Plata (FCNyM) [11/N785]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas [1010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure and composition of the Chironomid assemblage and its emergence patterns are influenced by environmental variables such as rainfall, photoperiod, water and air temperatures. Different species show synchronous emergence peaks at different times of the year.
Studies of the relationships between the temporal variation of biological phenomena and environmental factors are essential to understanding the dynamics of communities. Phenology is a structuring element and, together with voltinism, is related to timing of reproductive activities. The aim of this study is to ascertain the structure and composition of the Chironomid assemblage and its emergence patterns in relation to the environmental variables through the use of the Chironomid pupal exuviae technique using the Neotropical streams as a model. The streams presented similar species compositions. The highest density of pupal exuviae was recorded during spring and the greatest richness in late summer and early autumn. Chironominae presented greater prevalence throughout the year with oscillations for Orthocladiinae and Tanypodinae. Chironominae and Tanypodinae presented emergence peaks in spring-summer and Orthocladiinae in autumn-winter. Rainfall, photoperiod and water and air temperatures structured the Chironomid assemblage, influencing emergence. Univoltine, bivoltine and multivoltine species were recorded. The species presented interspecific synchronization in emergence peaks at different times of the year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据