4.3 Article

Wood-inhabiting macrofungi Hymenochaetales and Polyporales (Basidiomycota) in the Amazon Forest: relationship the abiotic factors and substrate colonization

期刊

出版社

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202220210554

关键词

Amazon; ecology; funga; fungi assemblage; polypore

资金

  1. Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Biodiversidade
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hymenochaetales and Polyporales are important macrofungi for the maintenance of tropical forests, as they are directly involved in the nutrient cycling of wood decomposition. Through collection studies in the Brazilian Amazon region, 91 species were identified, and their association with environmental conditions was discovered.
Hymenochaetales and Polyporales are important macrofungi for the maintenance of tropical forests, since they act directly in the nutrient cycling of the wood decomposition. In the Amazon, the largest tropical forest in the world, knowledge about Agaricomycetes is still insipient, since many areas have not yet been inventoried and new records appear each new study. To increase ecological knowledge about the Hymenochaetales and Polyporales, in the Brazilian Amazon region, collections were conducted in western Para, Brazil, relating these fungi to the substrate they colonize and to environmental variables. 91 species were identified, with greater macrofungi richness associated with the rainy season; these fungi showed preferences for dead woods, of small diameter (class 1 = 5,9. 39 cm) and, in stages of decomposition still rigid or intermediate. The abundance and richness of Hymenochaetales and Polyporales were influenced by air humidity and the assemblage composition was influenced by temperature, air humidity and rainfall. The results indicate a rich diversity for western Para region, these species are associated with environmental conditions, and may be threatened by the increasing pressure of human activity in the Brazilian Amazon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据