4.7 Article

Development and assessment of an improved powder-diffraction-based method for molecular crystal structure similarity

期刊

CRYSTENGCOMM
卷 24, 期 47, 页码 8326-8338

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ce01080a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2021-02394]
  2. Walter C. Sumner Foundation
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  4. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI) [PGC2018-097520-A-100]
  5. Principality of Asturias (FICYT)
  6. FEDER [AYUD/2021/51036]
  7. Spanish MINECO [RyC-2016-20301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying whether two experimental crystal structures correspond to the same polymorph is a challenging problem in crystallography. In this study, a new PXRD-based similarity index and comparison method is proposed, which shows improved agreement compared to the popular COMPACK method. The strengths and weaknesses of each method are evaluated by analyzing the structure pairs for which they disagree. Using COMPACK and VC-PWDF in combination may be successful at narrowing the grey area of difficult-to-compare structures.
Identifying whether two experimental crystal structures determined under different experimental conditions correspond to the same polymorph is a challenging problem in crystallography, and its solution has practical (and even legal) implications for various technological fields as well as for molecular crystal structure prediction. In this work, we assess the popular COMPACK method vis a vis powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD)-based comparison methods using a dataset of 44 939 structure pairs employed in a previous study [CrystEngComm, 2020, 22, 7170-7185]. We propose a new PXRD-based similarity index and comparison method (VC-PWDF, variable-cell powder difference) that substantially improves the agreement with COMPACK (2.84% total disagreement), compared to the CCDC packing similarity PXRD-based comparison tool (12.35%). By analysing the structure pairs for which COMPACK and VC-PWDF disagree, we evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of each method. COMPACK has a counter-intuitive dependence on its tolerance parameters, by which structures that are considered the same at a given tolerance are viewed as different at a looser tolerance. COMPACK's RMSD(N) can also increase with increasing tolerance values at fixed number of matching molecules (N). We demonstrated a few additional weaknesses of COMPACK: a) extremely costly or incorrect comparisons in molecules with highly-branched substituents (possibly due to its use of Ullmann's method), b) failure to match structures when the molecular connectivity is incorrectly determined, c) difficulties with molecules presenting helical chirality, and d) very large cluster sizes (up to 50 molecules) are sometimes needed to correctly identify unequal polymorphs. In turn, VC-PWDF has difficulty differentiating structures with similar packings, such as polytypes, and conformational and isomorphous phases. It is shown that the proposed VC-PWDF is at least as robust as COMPACK for comparing molecular crystal structures. Although a grey area of difficult-to-compare structures still exists, using both COMPACK and VC-PWDF in combination may be successful at narrowing it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据