4.7 Article

Augmented Reality and Mixed Reality Measurement Under Different Environments: A Survey on Head-Mounted Devices

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2022.3218303

关键词

Augmented reality (AR); environmental factor; head-mounted device (HMD); metaverse; mixed reality (MR)

资金

  1. DEVCOMU.S. Army Research Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article surveys environmental-related HMD papers with measurements from users in the field of AR and MR, reviewing the results from a 32-year span. Using a new classification method, trends over time and user feedback presence or absence are analyzed, along with subdivision of the papers into ten main categories for user assessment domains and methods. Similarities and differences among the papers' characteristics in behavioral experiments are also categorized.
Augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) have been two of the most explosive research topics in the last few years. Head-mounted devices (HMDs) are essential intermediums for using AR and MR technology, playing an important role in the research progress in these two areas. Behavioral research with users is one way of evaluating the technical progress and effectiveness of HMDs. In addition, AR and MR technology is dependent upon virtual interactions with the real environment. Thus, conditions in real environments can be a significant factor for AR and MR measurements with users. In this article, we survey 87 environmental-related HMD papers with measurements from users, spanning over 32 years. We provide a thorough review of AR- and MR-related user experiments with HMDs under different environmental factors. Then, we summarize trends in this literature over time using a new classification method with four environmental factors, the presence or the absence of user feedback in behavioral experiments, and ten main categories to subdivide these papers (e.g., domain and method of user assessment). We also categorize characteristics of the behavioral experiments, showing similarities and differences among papers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据