4.6 Article

Bayesian Cramer-Rao Lower Bound for Magnetic Field-Based Localization

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 123080-123093

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3223693

关键词

Bayesian Cramer-Rao lower bound; finger-printing; Gaussian process; indoor localization; magnetic field-based localization; particle filter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the achievable position accuracy of magnetic localization is analyzed using Bayesian Cramer-Rao lower bounds, and deterministic inputs are accounted for. A Gaussian process is used to approximate the true analytical model based on training data. The results show that magnetic localization has a high potential accuracy.
In this paper, we show how to analyze the achievable position accuracy of magnetic localization based on Bayesian Cramer-Rao lower bounds and how to account for deterministic inputs in the bound. The derivation of the bound requires an analytical model, e.g., a map or database, that links the position that is to be estimated to the corresponding magnetic field value. Unfortunately, finding an analytical model from the laws of physics is not feasible due to the complexity of the involved differential equations and the required knowledge about the environment. In this paper, we therefore use a Gaussian process (GP) that approximates the true analytical model based on training data. The GP ensures a smooth, differentiable likelihood and allows a strict Bayesian treatment of the estimation problem. Based on a novel set of measurements recorded in an indoor environment, the bound is evaluated for different sensor heights and is compared to the mean squared error of a particle filter. Furthermore, the bound is calculated for the case when only the magnetic magnitude is used for positioning and the case when the whole vector field is considered. For both cases, the resulting position bound is below 10 cm indicating an high potential accuracy of magnetic localization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据