4.3 Article

Bioinformatics Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes and Related Pathways in Acute Pancreatitis

期刊

PANCREAS
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 821-829

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002107

关键词

acute pancreatitis; bioinformatics analysis; differentially expressed genes; functional enrichment analysis; protein-protein interaction

资金

  1. National Natural ScienceFoundation of China [81972315]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates differentially expressed genes in acute pancreatitis (AP) and identifies CDH1 and VCL as potential key genes regulated by MAZ in AP.
ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the acute pancreatitis (AP).MethodsMicroarray datasets GSE3644, GSE65146, and GSE109227 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus database. Then, a comprehensive analysis of these genes was performed using Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction network analysis, core gene correlation analysis, and transcription factor prediction. Finally, the differences in the expression of hub genes in human organs and survival analysis in pancreatic carcinoma were evaluated.ResultsA total of 137 DEGs were screened, 128 genes were upregulated, and 9 genes were downregulated. Functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that these genes were mostly enriched in biological processes such as positive regulation of macroautophagy, cellular component such as focal adhesion, molecular function such as cadherin binding involved in cell-cell adhesion, and multiple pathways including tight junction. CDH1 and VCL were identified as hub DEGs, close interactions with MAZ, were expressed in human pancreas organs in various degrees. The high expression of CDH1 and VCL was significantly associated with poor prognosis in pancreatic carcinoma.ConclusionsThe core genes CDH1 and VCL may play a key role in AP through regulation by MAZ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据