4.2 Review

DNA repair-related genes and adipogenesis: Lessons from congenital lipodystrophies

期刊

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SOC BRASIL GENETICA
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2022-0086

关键词

DNA repair; adipogenesis; genetic lipodystrophies; metabolism

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classical and progeroid congenital lipodystrophies are rare diseases caused by pathogenic variants in genes, leading to various issues such as impaired adipose tissue homeostasis, insulin resistance, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and inflammation. Studying the link between adipogenesis and DNA repair in these diseases is of great significance.
Classical and progeroid congenital lipodystrophies are a collection of rare diseases displaying a large genetic heterogeneity. They occur due to pathogenic variants in genes associated with adipogenesis, DNA repair pathways, and genome stability. Subjects with lipodystrophy exhibit an impairment in the homeostasis of subcutaneous white adipose tissue (sWAT), resulting in low leptin and adiponectin levels, insulin resistance (IR), diabetes, dyslipidemia, ectopic fat deposition, inflammation, mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum commitments, among others. However, how pathogenic variants in adipogenesis-related genes modulate DNA repair in some classical congenital lipodystrophies has not been elucidated. In the same way, no data is clarifying how pathogenic variants in DNA repair genes result in sWAT loss in different types of progeroid lipodystrophies. This review will concentrate on the main molecular findings to understand the link between DNA damage/repair and adipogenesis in human and animal models of congenital lipodystrophies. We will focus on classical and progeroid congenital lipodystrophies directly or indirectly related to DNA repair pathways, highlighting the role of DNA repair-related proteins in maintaining sWAT homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据