4.6 Article

Electrochemical DNA sensing strategy based on strengthening electronic conduction and a signal amplifier carrier of nanoAu/MCN composited nanomaterials for sensitive lead detection

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 1504-1509

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6en00323k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51521006, 51222805, 51579096, 51508175, 51378190]
  2. Key Technology R&D Program of Hunan Province, China [2015SK2001-1]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals of China
  4. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2015DFG92750]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A DNA electrochemical sensor was fabricated using the modification of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) with ordered mesoporous carbon nitride (MCN), electrodeposited gold nanoparticles (EAu) and methylene blue (MB)/nanoAu/MCN as the signal amplifier, in which MB was inserted into the nanoAu/MCN composites for Pb2+ detection. The secondary structure of the trans-cleaving 8-17 DNAzyme, composed of the substrate strand (S1) and the enzyme strand (S2), was utilized for the sensor fabrication. S1 immobilized on the signal amplifier could hybridize with S2 and form a DNA double helix structure on account of the principle of complementary base pairing. With the activation of Pb2+, S2 was able to cleave the single RNA linkage with S1 by hydrolysis reaction to break S1 into two fragments. One of the fragments NS1' that was immobilized on the MB/nanoAu/MCN signal amplifier (S1'/MB/nanoAu/MCN) could hybridize with the DNA probe S3 immobilized on the modified electrode. With the help of the MCN's large specific surface area and the gold nanoparticles' good charge-transport capacity, the sensor exhibited excellent sensitivity and selectivity. The proposed sensing strategy represented a wide linear response in the range from 1.0 x 10(-3) to 1.0 x 10(-14) M. The sensor was also tested with real samples and represented a promising method for detecting Pb2+.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据