4.6 Review

Modeling nanomaterial fate and uptake in the environment: current knowledge and future trends

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 323-345

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5en00207a

关键词

-

资金

  1. MARINA project - EU Commission within the Seventh Research Framework Program of the European Union [263215]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1437307]
  3. SmartState Center for Environmental Nanoscience and Risk (CENR) at the University of South Carolina
  4. Arnold School of Public Health at the University of South Carolina
  5. EU FP7 Marie Curie Career Integration grant EcofriendlyNano [PCIG14-GA-2013-631612]
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1437307] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modeling the environmental fate of nanomaterials (NMs) and their uptake by cells and organisms in the environment is essential to underpin experimental research, develop overarching theories, improve our fundamental understanding of NM exposure and hazard, and thus enable risk assessment of NMs. Here, we critically review the state-of-the-art of the available models that can be applied/adapted to quantify/predict NM fate and uptake in aquatic and terrestrial systems and make recommendations regarding future directions for model development. Fate models have evolved from substance flow analysis models that lack nano-specific processes to more advanced mechanistic models that (at least partially) take nano-specific (typically non-equilibrium, dynamic) processes into account, with a focus on key fate processes such as agglomeration, sedimentation and dissolution. Similarly, NM uptake by organisms is driven by dynamic processes rather than by equilibrium partitioning. Hence, biokinetic models are more suited to model NM uptake, compared with the simple bio-accumulation factors used for organic compounds. Additionally, biokinetic models take speciation processes (e.g. particulate versus ionic uptake) into account, although identifying essential environment-specific processes to include in models remains a challenge. The models developed so far require parameterization, calibration and validation with available data, e.g. field data (if available), or experimental data (e.g. aquatic and terrestrial mesocosms), rather than extension to more complex and sophisticated models that include all possible transformation processes. Collaborative efforts between experimentalists and modelers to generate appropriate ground-truth data would advance the field most rapidly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据