4.5 Article

Cloning, sequence analysis and expression profiles of Toll-like receptor 7 from Chinese giant salamander Andrias davidianus

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2015.02.006

关键词

Chinese giant salamander; TLR7; Expression profile; Iridovirus

资金

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201203086]
  2. National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant [2013JBFZ02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Chinese giant salamander, Andrias davidianus, is the largest extant amphibian species in the world, which is of significance due to its specific position in the evolutionary history of vertebrates. Currently, limited information about the innate immune system of this animal is known. In this study, the toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), designated CgsTLR7, was cloned from Chinese giant salamander, A davidianus. The full-length cDNA of CgsTLR7 is 3747 bp, with an open reading frame of 3150 bp, encoding 1049 amino acids. The TLR family motifs, including the leucinerich repeat (LRR) and Toll/interleukin (IL)-1 receptor (TIR) domain are conserved in CgsTLR7, which indudes 19 LRRs and a TIR domain. The predicted amino acid sequence of CgsTLR7 has 71%, 65%, 63% and 55% identity with turtle, chicken, human and fugu TLR7 homologues, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis showed that CgsTLR7 is closest to that of frog TLR7 among the examined species. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis revealed broad expression of CgsTLR7 in tissues from apparently healthy Chinese giant salamanders with the highest expression in the liver and the lowest expression in the intestine. The mRNA expression was up-regulated and reached a peak level in the kidney, liver and spleen at 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after infecting the animals with the giant salamander iridovirus (GSIV), respectively. These results suggest that CgsTLR7 has a conserved gene structure and might play an important role in immune regulation against viral infections in the Chinese giant salamander. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据