4.6 Article

Loss-induced suppression, revival, and switch of photon blockade

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 106, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.043715

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11935006, 11774086]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Postdoctoral Fellowships for Research in Japan [P22018]
  3. NSFC [11935006, 12064010, 11775075]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China [2021JJ20036]
  5. Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Project of Hunan Province [CX20210471]
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P22018] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study has found that in a nonlinear optical-molecule system, the purely quantum effect of photon blockade can be revived by increasing loss during classical loss-induced transparency, leading to the emergence of a quantum critical point in the system. Simply tuning the loss can also realize a quantum switch between single-PB and two-PB.
Loss-induced transparency (LIT), featuring the revival of optical intensity by adding loss, has been demonstrated in classical optics. However, a fundamental question has remained unexplored, i.e., during the process of LIT, whether quantum correlations of the photons can also be revived or even tuned by increasing the loss. Here we find that, accompanying classical LIT in a nonlinear optical-molecule system, a purely quantum effect as photon blockade (PB) indeed can be revived with the help of loss. In particular, a quantum critical point emerges in the system: below the point, adding loss leads to the suppression of optical intensity and its correlations; in contrast, by surpassing the point, PB is revived and enhanced with more losses. Also, a quantum switch between single-PB and two-PB can be realized by simply tuning the loss. Our work provides a counterintuitive strategy to engineer quantum devices in a practical lossy environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据